Texting Crosswalk Honolulu Hawaii Fine Kirk Caldwell Law. The city of honolulu, hawaii wants everyone to learn that lesson. Honolulu is the first major us city to ban the use of a phone while crossing the street.
A pedestrian staring into the screen of a handheld device while traversing a busy street is an obvious urban deathwish, and the city of honolulu, hawaii, has now made this. The new law will go into effect october 25th. The third strike can cost you as much as $99.
The Honolulu Police Department, Which Supports The New Law, Will Begin Issuing Citations Beginning Oct.
Honolulu may be the first major city to make it illegal for pedestrians to text at will in what’s also being dubbed “the distracted walking. Beginning on october 24, you could be fined. Honolulu is now the first major city to ban texting while in a crosswalk.
The Third Strike Can Cost You As Much As $99.
With honolulu being the first major city to pass this law, mayor kirk caldwell wants other states to follow suit and make a ban to keep pedestrians safe due to the city having the. Texting while crossing the street now illegal in honolulu : Hawaii law targets 'smartphone zombies' with crosswalk ban.
Honolulu — Honolulu Implemented A New Law Wednesday, Under Which Anyone.
A ban on pedestrians looking at mobile phones or texting while crossing the street will take effect in hawaii's largest city in late october, as honolulu becomes the first major u.s. Those found guilty of a first. Honolulu mayor kirk caldwell said that while almost every state in the country.
Repeat Offenders Will Get Larger Fines:
Honolulu is the first major us city to ban the use of a phone while crossing the street. 2, the ticket will be $35 to $75. Hawaii law targets ‘smartphone zombies’ with crosswalk ban july 30, 2017 july 30, 2017 markosun offbeat a ban on pedestrians looking at mobile phones or texting while.
Honolulu Is The First Major City In The U.s.
The new law will go into effect october 25th. Texting against law when in a crosswalk. Opponents of the honolulu law argued it infringes on personal freedom and amounts to government overreach.